Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MIRROR] Adds INTJ skillchip #803

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2023
Merged

[MIRROR] Adds INTJ skillchip #803

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2023

Conversation

Steals-The-PRs
Copy link
Collaborator

Mirrored on Skyrat: Skyrat-SS13/Skyrat-tg#25223
Original PR: tgstation/tgstation#79902

About The Pull Request

Adds a new skillchip, it lets you taste food by examining it.
image
This has all of the effects of tasting food (various moodlets based on quality and food type) and can also trigger food allergies if you have them, however it does not consume the food nor give you any nutritional benefit.
You can buy it from a vendor or sometimes it spawns in maintenance.

Why It's Good For The Game

The players are constantly clamouring for more additions to our most loved and useful feature, skill chips.

intj

Changelog

🆑 Jacquerel
add: A new skill chip can be found in maintenance or purchased from the vendor, allowing you to experience food in new and exciting ways.
add: Abductors also have access to this incredible power, simply using their genius level brains.
/:cl:

* Adds INTJ skillchip (#79902)

## About The Pull Request

Adds a new skillchip, it lets you taste food by examining it.

![image](https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/assets/7483112/666ab42e-2918-43e5-835c-99c71a552325)
This has all of the effects of tasting food (various moodlets based on
quality and food type) and can also trigger food allergies if you have
them, however it does not consume the food nor give you any nutritional
benefit.
You can buy it from a vendor or sometimes it spawns in maintenance.

## Why It's Good For The Game

The players are constantly clamouring for more additions to our most
loved and useful feature, skill chips.
<details>

![intj](https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/assets/7483112/58de56aa-b4bc-48fc-8c22-fa9c7a74314b)

</details>

## Changelog

:cl:
add: A new skill chip can be found in maintenance or purchased from the
vendor, allowing you to experience food in new and exciting ways.
add: Abductors also have access to this incredible power, simply using
their genius level brains.
/:cl:

* Adds INTJ skillchip

---------

Co-authored-by: Jacquerel <[email protected]>
@Iajret Iajret merged commit 8718b68 into master Nov 24, 2023
24 checks passed
@Iajret Iajret deleted the upstream-mirror-25223 branch November 24, 2023 09:06
AnywayFarus added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2023
Iajret pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
* Reactions now use volume averaged purity (#81246)

## About The Pull Request
Cause it only makes sense

Currently the purity of reagents created in a reaction is computed as
follows

`total sum of purity of all reagents present / total number of reagents`

This is incorrect because regardless of how much "volume" of an
impure/pure reagent is present the purity of the final solution is
unaffected. Logically if we have more amount of an impure reagent the
more impure the final solution should be & same for opposite case. This
is the case for ph, where if we have a large volume of say "acidic"
reagent then changes in other reagents have a small effect to the
overall "acidity" of the solution. The same concept now applies for
purity as well

`get_average_purity()`accounts for volume thus yielding more realistic
results. The effect becomes more significant with larger volumes of
reagents.

:cl:
fix: reactions now compute purity of reagents based on their volume,
meaning larger amounts of reagents created will have more significant
effects on the final purity of the solution
/:cl:

* Reactions now use volume averaged purity

* Merge #818

---------

Co-authored-by: SyncIt21 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: SomeRandomOwl <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants